Malinda Lo
Blog
Sep 14, 2011
I have numbers! Stats on LGBT Young Adult Books Published in the U.S. – Updated 9/15/11
On Monday I noted that in light of this post from two authors who were asked by an agent to de-gay their book, I was planning to do some statistics wrangling and see if I could quantify some of what’s happening in LGBT YA publishing. Apparently my latent economics major is raring to go (or else I just really want to procrastinate, which is a distinct possibility), because I spent last night making pie charts.
To get my data, I used this bibliography of LGBT YA compiled by librarian/researcher Christine Jenkins, which lists books published in English from 1969-2009. I supplemented that bibliography with information for 2009-2011 kindly given to me by researcher Michael Cart, who specializes in LGBT children’s and YA books. Mr. Cart’s data for 2011 was incomplete because the year isn’t finished yet, but because I’ve been keeping track of LGBT YA novels for Diversity in YA, I topped off the list with a number of books I know have been published or will be published this year.1
The ultimate list of 371 titles is, therefore, as accurate as I could make it. I’m sure I missed some titles, but hopefully not too many.
The data showed that from 1969 to 2011, the number of LGBT YA novels has risen somewhat steadily, with a few dips in various years.
Click to enlarge
The most notable recent dip occurred in 2010, in which only 11 LGBT YA titles were published, compared to 36 in 2009 and 25 in 2011. This might be a reflection of the economy, which crashed in 2008, and most publishers shrank their lists in 2009. It’s nice to see, however, that the trend continues upward once again this year.
Then I took a closer look at LGBT YA published from 2000 to 2011, first splitting it up by publisher.
Click to enlarge
The category “Other Publishers” includes independent presses like Foglight Press and Alyson, as well as medium-sized publishing houses such as Disney Hyperion, Bloomsbury/Walker, Amulet, Candlewick, and Flux.
When the number of books published from 2000-2011 are added up, this is the distribution of LGBT YA among American publishers:
Click to enlarge
As you can see, 30% of LGBT YA is published by non-big 6 publishers, with Simon & Schuster leading the pack of the big 6. However, this data doesn’t conclusively prove that S&S is the the most gay-friendly publisher, because it doesn’t take into account the percentage of LGBT YA published by a publisher in relation to the total number of YA titles published by that publisher.
For example, let’s say a hypothetical Big Publishing House published 300 YA titles in 2010. If only 5 of those YA titles were LGBT-inclusive, that amounts to 1.6% of its entire YA list. On the other hand, if Medium Publishing House published 150 YA titles in 2010, and 5 of those titles are LGBT-inclusive, that’s 3.3%. If I had about a zillion more hours, I’d try to figure out the proportion of LGBT YA published by each of the major publishers in order to get a more accurate picture of how gay-friendly they are.2
I was also very interested in seeing the proportion of LGBT YA books that focused on boys, girls, and trans characters. The common wisdom is that books about gay boys vastly outnumber those about gay girls, and the numbers prove this:
Click to enlarge
I also discovered that a number of LGBT YA books weren’t actually about an LGBT teen, but rather were about a straight teen and his LGBT parents or adult guardians.
Adding the 2000-2011 YA titles together and splitting it out by gender brings us this handy pie chart:
Click to enlarge
This shows us that 50% of LGBT YA books are about boys, with only 25% about girls. I find this extremely depressing, especially considering the predominant readership of YA is female.
Even more depressing is the fact that only 4% of LGBT YA books are about transgender or genderqueer characters. The only light at the end of the tunnel about this statistic is that since 2007, every year has seen publication of at least one trans/genderqueer title, and in 2011 we have three (including one book that includes both trans and lesbian characters).
Finally, according to Harold Underdown’s YA Books Are Booming–but not That Much, there were approximately 4,000 YA titles published in 2010. That same year, only 11 LGBT YA titles were published. That amounts to 0.2% of YA books. That fraction is frankly too small to make a pie chart out of.
The numbers aren’t much better for this year. If we assume no growth and stick with 4,000 YA titles, we have 25 LGBT YA titles within that, which amounts to 0.6%. That means:
Less than 1% of YA novels have LGBT characters.
My takeaways from this number crunching are:
- I often hear people saying that publishers aren’t willing to publish LGBT YA, or that each publisher only publishes one LGBT YA per year. This, statistically, isn’t true. Every one of the big 6 publishers (and plenty of smaller ones) publish LGBT YA titles, and several of them do publish more than one per year.
- However, the proportion of LGBT YA to non-LGBT YA is so tiny as to be laughable.
- The good news is, the numbers have continued to increase over time, and other than the dip in 2010, the increase has sped up since 2000.
- The bad news is, the G in LGBT far outpaces L, B, or T.
I think, overall, it’s a two steps forward, one step back kind of situation. And I think that true growth in the number of LGBT YA novels will only come through active effort on the part of agents, editors, and publishers, to seek out and acquire LGBT YA novels.3 I know that change happens one person at a time, but simultaneously, it’s hard to not be discouraged by the stats.
Updated 9/15/11:
Several people have asked me to share the bibliography of books I used to make these lovely pie charts. The bibliography for books from 1969-2008 is available online here at Christine Jenkins’ site. For 2009-2011, Michael Cart shared his list of books with me, and then I supplemented it with my own list. I combined our lists into this handy PDF of 2009-2011 LGBTQ YA titles that you can download.
I can guarantee you that this list of probably not complete. Someone on Twitter yesterday told me I’d omitted the Pretty Little Liars series, and after reading her tweet I realized I’d also omitted the Gossip Girl series. This is true! My question is: Does every book in those series count? Do they all contain LGBTQ main or secondary characters? Also, sadly I should note that even if I double the number of titles on the list, the total percentage of LGBTQ YA will still only be approximately 1% of all YA books.
- After I compiled all these lists together, I sorted through it to identify trends/gaps. The bibliographies provided by Ms. Jenkins and Mr. Cart feature LGBT characters as main characters, as supporting characters, as parents, and sometimes they feature LGBT issues as a backstory. But I noticed when going through the original 1969-2009 bibliography that it omitted several major fantasy series that include LGBT secondary characters. I think this is because LGBT characters have only recently appeared in genre YA. In the past, they only appeared in realistic “problem novels.” Since the bibliographies already included books with secondary LGBT characters, I went ahead and added in those major series, as well as a few contemporary YA novels from the past few years that I’ve read and know contain secondary lesbian characters, but were omitted from the original bibliographies. Finally, when I went through the books from 2000-2011 to determine the percentage of books with boy vs. girl main characters, I removed the few middle-grade books and books published by non-American publishers that I found. [↩]
- I’ll note here that I’m published by Little, Brown, which in 2011 has published 4 LGBT YA titles, three of which are about girls, and one which is about an FTM trans boy. [↩]
- Some people will see that negatively as affirmative action or quotas, which is also disheartening because that misunderstands the purpose of affirmative action entirely. [↩]
thanks for compiling these stats!
As a bookseller, I delight in steering YA readers to books as fabulous as your Ash instead of the retro-sexist supernatural tripe that pollutes that market. It’s very sad seeing that publishers are so unwilling to publish and promote (and I’ve never seen any heavy promotion done on books with LGBT characters) YA books with LGBT characters — especially since the target audience is in a time of their lives where LGBT visibility is absolutely vital. A voracious reader of YA books when I was a teenager, I’m sad to remark that I probably would have had a lot easier time with my own sexual preferences had anything but heterosexuality been positively depicted in the books I consumed. We all have friends and family who have lost the fight over the despair of being different in a world intolerant of those differences. Most of us even know that depression keenly ourselves. YA LGBT lit could do a lot to ease that incredible burden of shame and invisibility. That it doesn’t is something that needs to be addressed more often than it is. Thank you for your work!
This is very interesting and disheartening data. Yet also oddly inspiring – since it gives us all great reasons to read, purchase, publish, and write more LGBTQ YA books. I, for one, would love to someday write a novel and add it to this collection.
Thanks for putting this together! And yes, an online, editable, comprehensive bibliography would be excellent.
I found you here too.
I was referred here by Madam Hardy from Whatever.
I think the article by Brown and Smith tries to make two points. The first point is that LGBT characters are underrepresented in YA literature. Your work here demonstrates that clearly. I agree that your methodology will under-report the number of novels with LGBT characters, and I also agree that doubling your estimates will still result in an under-representation of LGBT characters.
The second point that Brown and Smith make is that it is the fault of the publishers for the under-representation. I never accepted their argument for that point, as they are only using anecdotal evidence. Unfortunately, your data can’t make any conclusions about that point because it does not include acceptance rates by publishers.
I think the only way to get accurate data would be to survey authors and ask how many manuscripts contain LGBT characters, how many got accepted, and how many total manuscripts got accepted. That should give some estimate on the effects of LGBT characters in acceptance of novels. If anybody was interested in researching this further, I would start there. (Or, just follow the spiders.)
Finally, I am admiring your beautifully exponential data. I think a nice trend line would set if off nicely. That would give a short-term prediction on the number of novels in 2012 and 2013. I assume that a logistic regression will be more suitable over the long-run.
Keep up the fine work.
You’re my new number-sleuth hero, Malinda! I love, love, love your graphs and charts.
Oops! I just checked your database, and noticed an error in my book title. Could you change it to MY INVENTED LIFE instead of MY SO-CALLED LIFE (which was an excellent TV series 15 years ago, btw). Thanks for including me in your list!!!
Thanks, Chris! Your comment was temporarily trapped in spam due to the links. Re: regression analysis … wow that just gave me a real flashback to econ stats class.
I have no idea how to do this anymore. The fact that I once knew how to do it, though, gives me a weird pride.
Oy, sorry about that Lauren!
Thanks for your kind words about Ash!
Sure, teens have often read adult novels, and adults often read novels marketed toward teens. Just as scifi readers sometimes read mysteries. But just to keep this thing manageable, we have to have some defined parameters. That’s why the focus is on books published as young adult titles. If they’re not marketed toward teens, they’re not shelved in the YA section of bookstores, and they don’t get the same kind of library attention. Adult titles are just a different category.
I’m not entirely sure what you mean by “traditional” publishers here. Bold Strokes Books, which has a single title included on your list, is an independent GLBT publisher with a YA imprint, Soliloquy. You can view available titles here.
Thank you for this response.
To me, the previous comment sums up one part of the bigger issue: that (straight) girls are the target demographic. While that may be true of YA fiction generally, it’s not necessarily true of LGBT YA specifically. An LGBT publisher with a YA imprint isn’t necessarily going to have the same readers.
I’d love to see a statistic post like this with inclusion of race
I think that also speaks to the wider cultural issue in which we look at things from a male perspective; most entertainment media of any stripe is from a male perspective. Look at the comics page on Sunday, or look at any random selection of books, and you’ll get a preponderance of male views over female. If girls are the target of YA literature, then queer YA literature should offer more female perspectives than male; it likely doesn’t because the male view is the customary view, the one we’re all conditioned to adopt when reading or viewing something, and that is, overall, a problematic thing.
I’ve just started reading Good Girls Don’t, by Claire Hennessey, an Irish writer. This has a bisexual main character and so far it’s really good! It seems to have been unjustly overlooked though…
Erica – I’ve emailed you! Looking forward to chatting!
I’ve emailed it to you! I’d love to get together with other people and create a publicly-available list, it’s an excellent plan!
Another point from the UK context is that terribly few of these novels are published in the UK – which is one reason why it was really exciting to see Ash and Huntress being published in UK editions. Many of the other books are available, through Amazon or specialist bookshops such as the amazing Gay’s the Word in London, but this still means that they only really come to the attention of people who already know about them or are specifically looking for LGBT YA novels. My own research looks at provision in libraries and the preliminary results suggest that these books aren’t ending up in libraries because so few of them come from mainstream UK publishers.
I don’t really know why UK publishers are so reluctant to publish them – perhaps it’s because the UK market is smaller and so it is perceived as even more of a ‘niche’? Needless to say I don’t think this argument really cuts it, I’m hoping that my research will help to raise awareness and that we might see a turnaround soon, but sadly there is also a risk of publishers becoming even more risk-averse due to the poor economic situation.
The following books appear on my 2010 list but not yours:
Rhythm and Blues by Jill Murray – a great read. Protag is a lesbian.
The Frenzy by Francisca Lia Block – a bad, bad book by a wonderful author. Protag’s best friend is a gay boy.
The Cardturner by Louis Sachar – doesn’t really count as a queer book so shouldn’t be on your list. It’s in my “passing mention” category.
Poor Rich by Jean Blaisar – quality is so poor as to be unreadable, but the protag is a gay boy.
The Good Girl’s Guide to Being Kidnapped by Yxta Maya Murray – exciting book about getting kidnapped by a gang, funny & smart. The protag’s adopted dad is gay.
And last but not least, The End: Five Queer Kids Save the World. Unsung prob. due to indie press. Great read and it features a bunch of different “types” of lesbians, a trans kid, some bisexual kids….
It totally is, and strong bisexual girl characters are even rarer. _The Sky Always Hears Me and the Hills Don’t Mind_ is a great exception, as are _A Map of Home,_ _Of All the Stupid Things_, and, well, _Ash_.
I can address this for the 2010 list since the numbers are so small. Combining my & Malinda’s lists gives us 15* books. Of these, seven have queer protagonists; six have queer secondary characters; one has just a passing mention; and there was one book for which I couldn’t easily tell (Edges by Lena Roy – does anyone know?).
*mathematically it would seem to be 16, but I think _Very LeFreak_ is actually a 2009 book.
Thank you for publishing this!
There’s only one thing I would like to add to this very interesting and well-researched post, and that is that the way the LGBT YA novels by gender diagrams are currently framed, it looks as if “genderqueer/transgender” is being presented as a third gender. What would be better would be to make separate charts: one with LGBT YA by gender (where characters who do identify as a third gender are listed as such, but binary identified trans characters are not inaccurately presented as being an ‘other’ gender just because they are trans); and a second diagram showing the breakdown of how many cis-LGB books come out versus trans books (where the trans characters could be either straight or queer).
What would also be helpful is a breakdown, to the extent possible, of how many of these YA books are written by authors with a similar background to the character: how many gay/lesbian characters are written by gay or lesbian authors, how many bi characters are written by bi authors, and how many trans characters are written by trans authors (not by cis authors of any sexual orientation). I know of only one YA book about a trans character written by a trans author, but there are several such books written by authors who are not trans (and this can lead to problems in the writing!).
I noticed that the gender charts are misleadingly named not only because of the trans/genderqueer thing, but because one category is “adults.” Obviously, “adult” is not a gender. I plead working very late at night on pie charts and not being able to come up with a better title.
The goal of the chart is to show the breakdown of books about LGB boys vs. books about LGB girls, and by “boy” and “girl” I mean the most mainstream of definitions of boy and girl. As for how many books are about cisgendered books vs. trans books … er, there’s only ever like 1 or 2 books about trans characters per year, so it would be 99.9% vs. .01% at best.
Re: The Cardturner, I think there are a lot of “passing mentions” in the books included in the bibliographies, which I think is due to an effort to be as inclusive as possible, especially in the past. These days, I think a passing mention is not enough to warrant being considered as an “LGBT book.”
That’s interesting about the UK market. I’ve heard such conflicting things about it. I mean, in adult fiction the UK market is very very progressive and inclusive, but I’ve also heard it is unusually conservative in children’s/teens (and that YA is a very new category). You’ll notice that the UK edition of Ash takes pains to present it as straight-seeming as possible.
By “traditional” publishers I mean a publisher who will acquire a book from an author, edit it, typeset it, print it, and sell it in a bookstore. Independent publishers like Bold Strokes are certainly traditional in that sense, even if they are small.
Yes, adult is not a gender… I suppose that’s another thing that could be its own chart. It just didn’t really bother me so much as the other issue. I think it would also be interesting to do a breakdown of, among trans characters, FtM spectrum vs. MtF spectrum characters.
As for how many books are about cisgendered books vs. trans books … er, there’s only ever like 1 or 2 books about trans characters per year, so it would be 99.9% vs. .01% at best.
Well, that in itself is a very serious problem, and there should be a chart which graphically shows this! The title of this post is “Stats on LGBT YA Books Published in the US,” and not “Stats on Gay and Lesbian YA Books Published in the US.” (If you meant the latter, then you should title it the latter…)
The goal of the chart is to show the breakdown of books about LGB boys vs. books about LGB girls, and by “boy” and “girl” I mean the most mainstream of definitions of boy and girl.
I find this comment troubling. You seem to be saying in this comment that trans boys and girls are not “mainstream” (by which you mean cis?) boys and girls. As a trans* and gender non-conforming person myself, when I hear this, it sounds like another way of saying that binary-identified transgender boys and girls aren’t “really” just as much boys and girls as cis-boys and girls, so it’s OK for you to place such people in a third gender category, even if these youth do not identify in a third category. I really want to give you the benefit of the doubt, and I know your intentions are good — this still looks like an instance unconscious of cis-privilege.
Alternatively, you could label the chart “cis boy,” “cis girl,” “trans boy,” and “trans girl.” It’s not perfect, but at least it’s clearer, and doesn’t assume cis as the default that doesn’t even need to be stated.
(Which sort of reminds me of someone making a chart that broke down representation of characters by race, and said something like “boy, girl, boy of color, girl of color.” See the problem?)
I agree. You didn’t have The Cardturner on your list, and I think that’s the way it should be.
I hear that you feel that I’ve made errors in the representation of transfolk in these statistics. I appreciate the fact that you’re giving me the benefit of the doubt, and I hope you will continue to do that, because yes, I do mean well. Yes, I am cisgendered and do not have to deal with these issues personally on a daily basis. It’s true that I am privileged in this way. I do my best to be informed about these things, but yes, I write from my own perspective as a lesbian-identified Asian American woman. It’s definitely important that other perspectives speak up, and thank you for doing so with such courtesy.
Please also understand that the data above is incomplete and it was my best effort to be as fair and impartial on all levels, to all members of the LGBTQ community, as I could in the time that I have. If you take a look at the way I presented the results, I pretty clearly stated that the most depressing statistic of all was the very, very low percentage of books published that are about trans characters. I did not provide a chart illustrating that 0.6% of YA titles were LGBT inclusive because I felt that the sliver would have been too small to present in a way that was meaningfully readable. I think a chart about trans vs. LGB characters would face the same problem, but I’m not a graphics professional so there’s probably a way to do it that I personally am unable to come up with.
Regarding the word “mainstream”: I think you have misinterpreted the way I intended that to read. Personally, I do not at all believe that trans girls and boys aren’t “really” girls and boys. I meant “mainstream” in its dictionary sense, and placed in the context of the commercial publishing industry, which is what this post is about. In the commercial publishing industry, especially YA, gender (as you can imagine) is still broadly understood as binary; it is still broadly limited by heteronormative assumptions. So, in this case, “mainstream” = “the ideas, attitudes, or activities that are regarded as normal or conventional; the dominant trend in opinion, fashion, or the arts.” (I’m quoting from the dictionary on my computer.) But I do see how the word “mainstream” could trigger other connotations for transfolk, and I’ll keep that in mind in the future.
I have chosen to categorize the LGBT books’ characters according to boy, girl, queer/trans, and adults because I know that in the commercial publishing industry, “boy books” and “girl books” are categories often discussed. Because there are so few books about trans characters, they are often separated out in the broader discourse on LGBT YA. In a way, it’s an attempt to draw attention to their existence; if books with trans characters were melded in with “boys” or “girls,” the very few trans characters would be rendered invisible. I pulled out “adults” as a category because I believe that YA titles with adult LGBT characters are different than YA titles with teen LGBT characters.
With these categories, I’m trying to present a picture of the books’ contents as they exist. I think the main issue here is that I’ve put “gender” in the title of the chart, when in fact the chart isn’t about gender; it’s about the kinds of LGBT characters represented in those books. That was a mistake on my part.
Yes, I do see what you mean. That’s a great way to do it. I’ll try to find some time to redo that chart and maybe post more about these concerns.
Thank you! I appreciate the time you are putting in here to make this happen. I am glad that the conversation about Gay YA is taking place because it’s an issue that deserves more attention. If there’s any way I can be of help, please let me know. In no way do I speak for all trans*/gender non-conforming people; I’m trying to do my small part so that trans* voices aren’t absent from the conversation (both because some trans* folk are queer, and also because LGBT has a T in it).
I think that both saying cis when you mean cis, and labeling the chart something that doesn’t create confusion, will solve this problem. ^_^
It is not my intention to attack anyone, only to provide constructive criticism. I recognize that you are putting a lot of effort into this and mean well. Trans* perspectives are often overlooked in some LGBT spheres. This is not about you personally, but a general, and sad, fact.
It is my personal experience that most instances of whatever-privlege cropping up are not about malice, but simply due to overlooking things, or lack of knowledge and awareness. So that’s why I posted. “LGBT” is a complex acronym, because it describes two separate things; trans and queer are, in a sense, separate “axes”. One can be trans and queer, or trans and straight (or asexual), just as one can be trans and binary-identified, or trans and non-binary identified. Yes, this makes graphical representations more complicated, but it also more accurately describes reality.
I think a chart about trans vs. LGB characters would face the same problem, but I’m not a graphics professional so there’s probably a way to do it that I personally am unable to come up with.
I think the best thing to do in that situation would just to be more transparent about the charts you did not make and why. It would be helpful for you to explain the charts you did not make (queer vs. straight YA, trans vs. cis YA) and why you did not make them, and to be transparent about the statistics you gave here, so it doesn’t appear that these charts were omitted because you never thought to make them, but because the representational problems are so stark, they cannot even be translated into a pie chart. One to three trans YA books published each year, all almost certainly by cis authors, is quite a problem! (I know of only one trans YA book written by a trans author. Only one.)
Regarding the word “mainstream”: I think you have misinterpreted the way I intended that to read. Personally, I do not at all believe that trans girls and boys aren’t “really” girls and boys. I meant “mainstream” in its dictionary sense, and placed in the context of the commercial publishing industry
I am glad to hear that you do not personally consider transfolk to not be “really” their genders. I recognize that you meant “mainstream” in the dictionary sense, in the context of the commercial publishing industry. All this essentially says is what I already know: that in the cis-centered, hetero-normative world of commercial publishing (as in elsewhere in society), transfolk are not “mainstream” examples of their genders (i.e. cis-provilege and transphobia are the default, are themselves mainstream). This is why this is triggering. (I know “mainstream” = cis. >_<)
I recognize that the publishing world, like most of society, still thinks of transfolk that way. You have the choice as a blogger to accept that assumption, or to challenge it in how you represent your statistics.
Also: if transfolk make up such a small number of these characters, anyway, including binary trans characters in the "boy" and "girl" categories won't even change your percentages by any visible margin! It almost feels in this case that there should just be a footnote that trans characters are categorized by the gender they identify with, and that you would have made a separate chart showing cis/trans breakdown except there actually are almost no trans characters at all, and so, yeah, a different problem.
Alternatively, as I said below, making "cis" and "trans" separate categories (with cis labeled and not default) would also mostly solve the issue — the only folks who would be left out in that analysis are non-binary identified characters. (As a non-binary identified person I care personally, but hey, any movement in the right direction is good movement. And there's probably, what, one non-binary identified character in all of these books?)
You are absolutely correct in saying, "In the commercial publishing industry, especially YA, gender (as you can imagine) is still broadly understood as binary; it is still broadly limited by heteronormative assumptions." I think we can agree that these are the assumptions we would both like to see challenged and broadened. My only point to add here is that many transfolk are binary identified — it's a common cis misunderstanding that all transfolk are non-binary in terms of gender simply for being trans (just like it's a common misunderstanding that all transfolk are queer). I'm not sure whether there's been a misunderstanding/momentary mental slip on your part, or if you are aware of this and are simply stating what the publishing industry still believes. It can be difficult to parse this out in online communication.
Because there are so few books about trans characters, they are often separated out in the broader discourse on LGBT YA. In a way, it’s an attempt to draw attention to their existence; if books with trans characters were melded in with “boys” or “girls,” the very few trans characters would be rendered invisible.
Here is the Catch 22, as I see it: if you include trans characters as the genders they identify with, you risk making them invisible, but if you pull them out and place them in a separate category, you reinforce the narrative that they’re not “really” that gender. I think, as I said above, that one solution to this is to include a footnote to the chart explaining that both cis and trans characters are included in each gender category, and then give a separate statistic about the trans characters (i.e. “Only .5% of LGBT YA included a trans character (three books this year), all three books were written by cis authors, two of these books included a MtF spectrum character, and one included a FtM spectrum character.”). Or whatever the real stats are. Then both goals are accomplished.
I hope this is helpful.
Fandom’s actually had some recent discussions about the fact that a bigger percentage of slashers are queer girls than people tend to think (including slashers themselves). But I think the fanfic parallel goes more towards explaining the why than towards making it all okay.
Part of the reason women who could be interested in slash fic about women OR men (whatever their own sexual orientation is) tend to read and write about men is that the selection of well-developed male characters and complex relationships between men is bigger in popular media. That’s only one reason, and a huge debate in itself, but it’s also a factor that doesn’t exist in original fiction. The fact that there are twice as many books about gay boys than gay girls brings that factor back in where it didn’t already exist, so you’re back to having more boys on offer than girls, as the focus and as the ones who get to narrate the experience. And with both readers and writers being mostly female, we end up with women talking to girls about queerness through the medium of boys and their sexuality. It’s not inherently bad, it has a place, but I’d be happier if that place wasn’t twice as prominent as the one for queer girl characters.
I think that’s important for queer girl readers, for straight girl readers who might find out later on they’re not that straight (because being able to find characters like you is good but already knowing they’re there is even better), for any kind of reader being exposed to more than one kind of queerness.
And in general, I’d just like things to be more balanced. I wouldn’t want YA to have twice as many boy MCs as girl MCs. Tjis is and important enough issue that I’d like balance here, too. Girls are given enough encouragement to prefer a male narration of the world without all that extra help.
“This shows us that 50% of LGBT YA books are about boys, with only 25% about girls. I find this extremely depressing, especially considering the predominant readership of YA is female.”
For Star Trek fanfiction, the predominant readership was female, and _as a consequence_ there were a lot more LGBT male characters than female characters.
I don’t have statistics one way or the other, but I’d wonder if the YA market is similar — ie, there are more LGBT boys because that’s what sells better to a female audience?
I assure you, I am not trying to invalidate your research in any way, but I wonder how many YA books skip the issue entirely? Can a book be about the adventure, the problem, the issue and completely ignore who likes whom? I understand that in which case it is automatically assumed that the characters are not LGBT, but could such books also give LGBT readers someone to identify with, since the “straight” relationship is a non-issue?
Based on the amount of reading I do, I believe your overall conclusions are accurate. My observations seem to confirm them anecdotally: there are far fewer gay than straight characters; those who are gay tend to be secondary rather than main characters; and they tend to be male rather than female . Bisexual and transgendered characters are the rarest.
But a caution is in order that nobody systematically surveyed these 4000 books. I could see some omissions immediately, particularly with the 2010 books. Here are four 2010 books with gay characters that came immediately to mind, which would increase the 2010 list by 30% alone:
Hex Hall, Rachel Hawkins
The Secret Year, Jennifer R. Hubbard
The Deathday Letter, Shaun David Hutchinson
Mostly Good Girls, Leila Sales
And since I didn’t do a systematic survey either, but just came up with these off the top of my head, I know these lists are still under-reports. Still pitifully small numbers, I agree.
Interesting how some of the talk was about how some groups are not ‘mainstream’ and that may affect the number of books written, the number of books sold, or so on.
From what I’ve seen, the needs, wants, and life of ‘non-mainstream’ folk are 90% mainstream. They go through puberty, attend high school, get jobs, have friends, fall in love, and so on.
If fictional works about these ‘non-mainstream’ characters focus specifically on those things that make them different, I could see how the books might be marketed differently.
However, if the books were about a, say, teenage bisexual transgender werewolf fighting Italian demons, well, being transgender may present some interesting challenges, but most may not be related to that.
Personally, I think the most under-represented minority is the asexual teen. I’ve only come across one character who identified themselves as asexual, and that was in Guardian of the Dead by Karen Healey.
Oh, thank you for raising this issue!
I’m asexual and I read about no one who was like me growing up. That was very confusing, to say the least.
Thank you for putting this together!
Noticed the Gone series by Michael Grant are missing from the list. The character in question, Dekka (a black lesbian with the power to turn off gravity), is in all four books released so far, but she wasn’t introduced until late in the first book so I don’t think her sexuality was mentioned until the second one. By the fourth book she’s one of the major supporting players though (pretty much best friends with the main hero), and she’s supposed to be included on the book jacket of the next book. The first book was released in 2008, with one per year published ever since.
There’s also one in Lauren Bjorkman’s _My Invented Life_.
I can see how a reader could read a character with no romantic interests as queer, sure. But YA these days, anyway, is almost always about romance. I don’t remember the last time I read a YA that didn’t include a romance. Even YA books targeted at straight boys include romance somehow. Regardless, I think if the character isn’t openly LGBT, they couldn’t be counted for this list, since it seeks to count books in which characters *are* openly LGBT.
Actually, I think Christine Jenkins’ list from 1969-2004 is pretty accurate. I could be wrong, but she’s been working on that bibliography for years and it was analyzed extensively in her book with Michael Cart, The Heart Has Its Reasons. The last couple of years are, yes, less accurate. But as I mentioned, even if you double the number of books counted (which I don’t think is possible), it will still be a very low number.
It would be fascinating to create a list of YA novels without any romance. Shipbreaker is the first one that comes to my mind.
I loved Ship Breaker! One of my favorites of the last few years. But … I thought there was romance in it? Not exactly swoony romance, but it was pretty clear to me that Nailer had a thing for the girl.
I read it awhile back so you may be right…Does unrequited love count as romance for these purposes? If so, then the only one I’m coming up with off the top of my head is Hatchet, and that’s neither recent nor exactly YA.
As You Wish, by Jackson Pearce, has a gay character in it. It was published in the last three years or so. Please include it, it was a really good book.
Thanks so much for this! I’m compiling a list of LGBTQ books for my own readers for my webpage, and unless you object strenuously, I’m linking to both this article and to Jenkins’ work. (Need I say ASH and HUNTRESS are on the list?!) It makes my head ache to think of the work you did!